"While you're here, could you also…" — how job scopes quietly grow, when that's fine, and how to keep the price attached to the plan.

Almost every job that ends in a billing argument followed the same script: the work grew along the way, nobody wrote anything down, and the final invoice surprised someone. Builders call it scope creep, and it cuts both ways — homeowners add "one more little thing", and tradies discover genuine problems that weren't visible when they quoted.
Scope creep isn't avoidable. Unmanaged scope creep is.
Three reasons, usually. First, discovery: nobody knows what's behind a wall until it's open — rot, dodgy old wiring, and hidden water damage are found, not predicted. Second, homeowner additions: once a tradie you trust is on site, it's genuinely efficient to have them look at other things. Third, vague briefs: if the original description was loose, everyone fills the gaps with different assumptions.
No extra work without a price first — in writing, even if "writing" is a text message. It takes two minutes: "Happy to do the extra power point while I'm here, that'd be $180 on top." "Great, go ahead." Done. Both sides now have the same expectation, timestamped.
This protects the tradie as much as you. Nobody enjoys invoicing for work the client doesn't remember agreeing to.
If your place is more than a few decades old, assume something unplanned will turn up and hold a contingency — 10 to 20 per cent of the job price is a common rule of thumb. If nothing surfaces, you've lost nothing. If something does, it's an expected cost instead of a crisis.
Scope agreements scattered across phone calls, texts and site conversations are how genuine misunderstandings happen. Keep the job's messages in one thread — QuickQuote's chat keeps the whole conversation, photos and agreed changes in one place both sides can scroll back through.
Connecting homeowners with trusted local tradies. Made in Sydney.